" /> Dark Rantings: September 1986 Archives

« March 1985 | Main | October 1986 »

September 28, 1986

Rant of Younger Days

From: Mikki Barry (ooblick@unirot.UUCP)
Subject: Re: Name Changing

View: Complete Thread (3 articles)

Original Format
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Date: 1986-09-28 11:18:00 PST
In article <433@unc.unc.UUCP> gauchs@unc.UUCP (Susan E. Gauch) writes:
>I'll probably get flamed for being a married type person posting
>to soc.singles, but what the heck.

I'm married too. But I post to net.singles because it seems that in
a lot of ways, I am far more "single" than some who lack the piece
of paper. Haven't been flamed yet, but if soc.singles really want
me to go away, I will.

>The decision was easy because my number one priority was to have the
>same name as my husband. When we got married, we became members of
>the same family, and I wanted our names to reflect that.
>We could have hyphenated our names, but that seemed like twice the
>work, and then both of us would feel weird instead of one.

Why didn't he change his to yours then?

>I never considered keeping my maiden name. Here's the part that I
>expect flames on.
>I find it confusing when a woman keeps her own name. It gives me
>the same sort of feeling as when a man decides to not wear a
>wedding band. I wonder if there is a lack of true commitment.

I wonder if you can really make such generalizations. And I wonder
what you mean by "true commitment". If I have to give up a part of
myself that a man does not in order to achieve "true commitment",
you can keep it.

As for wedding bands, I feel perfectly committed to my husband without a
"property rights" sign attatched to him (or to me). If either of us want
to wear a wedding band, fine (in fact, I do. I like them). But don't
make the bad assumption that either name changing, or gold rings has
ANYTHING to do with level of commitment.


>In conclusion, I think that every woman/couple has to make their own
>decision, but I thought I'd make an argument on the side of changing -
>it's not always just a sign of trying to conform to society.

It's not? Then why didn't he change his name? Why didn't you both choose
a neutral name? And why are you trying to equate *your* name change with
commitment level?

Yes, it is a personal decision. Frankly, I don't care one way or the
other. But I really resent people trying to measure my marriage by the
fact that I did NOT change my name.


Mikki Barry

September 03, 1986

More Old Cruft

Just to prove I've been around awhile :-)

From: Mikki Barry (barry@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU)
Subject: Re: My deflowering

View: Complete Thread (20 articles)

Original Format
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Date: 1986-09-03 10:07:15 PST
In article <1134@bu-cs.bu-cs.BU.EDU> sam@bu-cs.UUCP (Shelli Meyers) writes:

>Lisa, Lisa, Lisa. You underestimate your own taste in food! Whipped
>cream is *outstanding*! Jello's viscosity makes it interesting for
>some uses, but a full appreciation can be had by *combining* the two
>in mass quantities. We'll check that theory at the Boston net.party.

Oh but how glorious it would be to combine jello with whipped cream.
It does *sooo* well with Austrailian beer (of which there was much
at worldcon)

>In the meantime, can somebody tell Henry and I how to make ooblick?

If you really have to ask, you will ruin your reputation. What if the
ooblick in question doesn't want to be made?

Mikki Barry

unirot!ooblick
barry@mit-eddie