Was Q Foothead?
From: The Omnipotent (q@access.digex.com)
Subject: Re: Q who?
View: Complete Thread (10 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.fan.q
Date: 1992-02-09 13:27:57 PST
In article <1992Feb5.031740.14555@watserv1.waterloo.edu> dmcanzi@watserv1.waterloo.edu (David Canzi) writes:
>A very combative and often obnoxious individual. (Actually, I didn't
>usually notice it because I was never the target of it.) He never
>admitted to a real name, and he was probably more willing to insult
>people because he was anonymous.
>
>His articles contained a mixture of arguments and insults, rather than
>consisting wholly of insults like many of yours. For this reason, and
>reasons pointed out by Paul Dubuc, I don't think you're "foothead"
>after all.
Well, Dave, I've decided to turn over a new leaf. I will now immediately
begin being the "kinder and gentler" Q. The one with more arguments than
insults. The "new and improved" Q. That will be me, yessiree. And I'll
start right now since I know that the members of soc.men really don't wish
me to go away since only 10 of them sent me "go away" mail. Two of these
were forgeries from Pitt. So, what can I say. The overwhelming lack of
hostility in my direction, save from that bastion of intellectual prowess
known as Pittsburgh, shows me that I am still wanted. I am deeply touched.
And, as always, thank you for your support.
Q