" /> Dark Rantings: October 2003 Archives

« September 2003 | Main | November 2003 »

October 30, 2003

Star Chamber?

If this doesn't scare you to your core, you really ought to rethink your priorities. Even if you love the Shrub, what would happen with this type of precedent used by an Administration you DON'T like?

MIAMI – It's the case that doesn't exist. Even though two different federal courts have conducted hearings and issued rulings, there has been no public record of any action. No documents are available. No files. No lawyer is allowed to speak about it. Period.

Yet this seemingly phantom case does exist - and is now headed to the US Supreme Court in what could produce a significant test of a question as old as the Star Chamber, abolished in 17th-century England: How far should a policy of total secrecy extend into a system of justice?

Secrecy has been a key Bush administration weapon in the war on terrorism. Attorney General John Ashcroft warns that mere tidbits of information that seem innocuous about the massive Sept. 11 investigation could help Al Qaeda carry out new attacks.

Servers and Software and Blogs, Oh MY!

"When called by a panther, don't anther" - Ogden Nash

Maybe I should have listened. As wonderful as the new Panther operating system is for macs, the server version should come with a big warning label that says "Caution - This Product Could Blow Away All Of Your Server Configurations - Leading to heart palpitations, dangerous behavior, and sleep disorders."

The plan - replace ancient G3 server technology with a nice G4. Implementation was to include a low, careful progression of steps, mapping out exactly where things should be, carefully copying things from one machine to another, leaving the G3 in place until completion, testing each piece as I went along, etc. I prepared the G4 by putting in SCSI cards so I could add tape backup, replacing one of the hard drives to a much bigger one, adding some memory, and basically making it a kick ass server. Then I read that Panther Server has a wonderful new feature that allows you to export all of your server settings in one fell swoop. Well gee, I thought....why not upgrade the G3 to panther, then export all of the settings to the G4. What a time saver! Yeah, great idea.

Except for one thing.....upgrading to Panther caused EVERYTHING to stop working. Everything. All virtual hosts were gone. All server administration settings were gone. Attempting to connect to the administration functions failed. Attempting to rebuild the virtual hosts in the web server configurations would not save, and gave a strange dialog box about bugs I should report to Apple. This was all, obviously, not good joss.

After planning ritual sepiku, a much more rational friend told me that perhaps I should just restore the boot disk from the backup I had made the week before. Wow, what a concept! :-) So I prepared to do this by installing a new bootable version of the operating system on another disk, which I would then tell the machine was the boot disk, so I could wipe the original boot disk and bring it up via restore. Well, that didn't work either. Try as I might, the machine outright refused to boot off of any other disk but the boot disk or the CD for the OS, which immediately wants you to install the new OS. I was too tired to fight with it anymore, and was about to just toss it all out the window, when I figured, why not check the G4 and see if it behaves in a rational manner. After all, I could just move most of the files over there in one fell swoop, and cross my fingers, cast a few spells, and see if it works.

It did work. After a few fits and starts, and the time ticking closer and closer to dawn when I turn into a pumpkin, I actually seem to have gotten most things to work. I'm sure it will need some tweaks, and the slow careful configuration I wanted to do is history, but things I think MOSTLY work. Once I wake up, maybe a few more spells will be in order.

Piss Poor Planning

Repeat after me - I will NEVER install a new operating system, making the assumption it will not blow away ALL of my settings. Now repeat it 10 more times.


I installed Panther server over 10.2.8 server on my G3 server box. It ATE all of the configuration files, and would not even LET me reconfigure, saying it couldn't connect to server administration, etc. etc. After trying various ways to boot from another drive, and wipe the boot drive and restore things to a previous backup, I found I was also unable to restore anything properly, so I basically had a fit and began my plan to migrate everything over to a faster server a bit earlier than I'd planned.


So I will be restoring more of this week's and last week's postings as I can. Bear with me.

October 29, 2003

Apple Store in Clarendon

I love Apple. I love Apple Stores. Except for this one. This is the letter I sent to steve@apple.com. I wonder if there will be any response.

----
I have been a Apple user since 1982, and a Mac user since 1984. Apple has always prided itself on ease of use and customer service ethic. So what happened to your Clarendon retail store in Virginia? Someone should tell the manager there he isn't working for Dell or Gateway and to get with the program.

I have had pleasant experiences each time I have gone to the retail store in Tysons. Since it is closed for renovation, I went to Clarendon to purchase Panther server and return a Powerbook power supply that broke AGAIN (they all seem to break in the same place. I take them to Tysons and they are replaced cheerfully and quickly). The "Genius" at Clarendon told me he was unable to help me without a machine serial number. I had already driven for 45 minutes through traffic to get there the first time, and asked him to please look up my serial numbers in your purchase or repair databases, because I was listed in there many many times. The person said he couldn't do that. I told him that I knew he could by using last name and zip code. He said it was too difficult.


Another salesperson overheard and said the same thing about being unable to look up the information. I asked for a manager. My husband was standing near the manager on the other end of the store, when the manager burst into a rant about unreasonable customers (meaning me, obviously) which was overheard by other customers.

The manager would not talk to me. However, the salesperson returned and told me that the connector in question never breaks in their store, therefore I must be misusing the product. How does one misuse a power supply and connector? In any case they told me that nobody should be replacing these for me because they never break at the store, but they would replace it ONE LAST TIME. If the product is defective, then why only replace it ONE LAST TIME? Especially since the latest power supply (which I PURCHASED while this escapade was going on) has been redesigned to FIX the problem. I spoke to three other Powerbook owners whose power supplies broke in exactly the same spot, and I only queried a few friends. Imagine how many I'd find if I post the question to a website or two

I can't tell you how disappointed I am in the attitudes here. This is the second time I have had poor service in the Clarendon store. The last time was dealing with a keyboard replacement. The final "resolution" of this issue was to tell me to call Apple Customer Service (for which they didn't give me the telephone number for, despite asking). After finally saying they would replace the power supply, I was told they didn't have any in stock for replacements, but they DID have them for purchase. I am supposed to telephone their store and give them the case number to finally get the replacement.

Please let management know that Apple stores should be friendly places that are as easy to use as your equipment?

October 28, 2003

Stupid people SHOULD NOT DRIVE

It's true...stupid people should NOT be allowed to drive. Under ANY circumstances. Of course, most of the stupid people don't believe they are stupid, and think I'm talking about someone else, but I'm not. I am talking about YOU, you stupid person. YOU, the one who cut me off today, turning onto route 7, diving into the left lane, then going 45 in a 55. And YOU, the moron with the DC plates who tried to swerve into our lane because you were too STUPID to drive and yap on your cell phone at the same time, then started GESTURING to the person on the phone. So you had one hand on the phone, stuffed into your ear, and the other, wildly gesticulating. The fact that you didn't hit us was sheer luck!


And what about you stupid people who don't know how to use that little lever on your steering column that is put there so you can indicate TURNS? Yes, that lever with the dust built up on it. The one you never use when careening through lane changes, or stomping your brakes in front of me, as if somehow I'm supposed to KNOW you are going to turn, and not just hitting your brakes for the fun of it. And YOU with the out of state plates, putzing down the road with a STREAM of cars behind you. As you slam on your brakes at every intersection so you can read the road sign to see if that's where you're supposed to go, has it EVER crossed your mind to pull over and use a map? Or perhaps find a pay phone and get better directions?


They wonder why there are aggressive drivers. Perhaps it's because so many STUPID people are on the roads, driving the rest of us totally insane. The sheer frustration of dealing with SO MANY stupid people on the road takes its toll when you just want to get where you're going. So please, if you're a stupid person, get your stupid self off the road. And remember, I'll try to be nicer, when you try to be less stupid.

October 27, 2003

Reward for the Liar

Lie and cheat for political purposes to keep your job and keep America afraid and get a REWARD! Yes, that's right. "Overstate" (aka tell bald faced lies to draw attention to yourself and your "cause") and the Shrub might reward you with a promotion. How in the HELL are the American people supposed to react to this kind of blatant bullshit? Is it possibly because mainstream news organizations aren't picking up on this because it's ONLY general aviation after all? Regardless of your political leanings, watching our Commander in Chief promote someone for blowing smoke up our proverbial butts should be unnerving to the point of removing him from office.

From Avweb Newswire

Just a week after telling a Congressional panel that maybe GA is not such a big security threat after all -- remarks that elicited much glee from AOPA, as AVweb reported last Monday -- TSA chief James Loy was nominated by President Bush to fill the No. 2 slot in the Department of Homeland Security. If approved by the Senate, Loy will take over as Tom Ridge's deputy, filling a vacancy created when Gordon England became Secretary of the Navy this month. EAA applauded the nomination. "Admiral Loy has come to adopt a view of general aviation that is generally balanced, fair, and grounded in the need to preserve the American citizen's right to freedom of movement," EAA said in a news release on Thursday. "Most importantly, [Loy] set forth for the congressional record what EAA and others have believed all along; that the perceived security threat posed by general aviation has been consistently overstated in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks." Loy took over the agency in July 2002. TSA Deputy Administrator Steve McHale will serve as acting chief until a successor for Loy is named.

The White House whine: 'It's all the media's fault'

I LOVE the Christian Science Monitor. It's one of the best rags around.

After several months of bad news, the Bush administration has discovered the source of its problems. It turns out that it's not the Democrats, not really anyway. It's not Saddam or Osama. It's not even Bill Clinton. No, the problem, it turns out, is the media.

Call it a filter, or a bias - but the news of late is not good. [Christian Science Monitor: All Stories]

October 25, 2003

A man riding a tricycle and wielding...

here's one for the STUPID files. A man riding a tricycle and wielding a handgun struck a car and attempted to hijack it Tuesday morning in northeast Salem, police said Tuesday. But officers said that what could have been a tragedy had comic-opera aspects that resulted in the arrest of 24-year-old Oswaldo Alejandro Valenciano. Lt. Dan Cary said the only word to describe Tuesday’s sequence of events was “bizarre.” . [Madville.com]... [PsychoSensei's Pontifications]

October 24, 2003

A New Way to Stop Spam?

"Dear Christian Internet. Please stop the pornographic spam that invades my mailbox. Since this is your Internet, I'm sure it won't take you too long to take care of it. Thank you. Your Heathen SCUM friend, Mikki"

From a ridiculously obnoxious article:

The Internet was created by the United States of America - a Christian nation [ref. 1, 2, 3] - and should not be used to spread anti-Christian, secular, or non-Christian propaganda and hatespeech. This is our Internet, and we should exercise our position as its owners and as the guardians of civilization to stop its misuse.

Click the link above if you want to read more of this drivel.

October 22, 2003

N. Korea Rejects US Nuke Program Offer

As RS says, "North Korea should be sent to its room without supper"

North Korea on Tuesday rejected President Bush's offer of a written pledge not to attack in exchange for the communist nation agreeing to scrap its nuclear weapons program. [AP World News]

School chief passes literacy test on 4th try

Ok, maybe I'm an elitist scum, but should stupid people be allowed to run school systems? Or should stupid people instead have to compete for jobs that match their intelligence level?

Wilfredo T. Laboy, Lawrence school superintendent who drew both international headlines and hand-wringing after failing part of a state-mandated literacy test required for Massachusetts educators, passed the exam on his fourth try, state education officials said yesterday. (By Anand Vaishnav, Globe Staff) [Boston Globe: Local]

October 21, 2003

Curtains Ordered for Media Coverage of Returning Coffins

So, tell me why a President can be so insecure about his own position, that he denies honors to those who have died in service of our country? What a surprise that he'd lose public support for an occupation that never had a plan or an endpoint in sight?

Since the end of the Vietnam War, presidents have worried that their military actions would lose support once the public glimpsed the remains of U.S. soldiers arriving at air bases in flag-draped caskets.

To this problem, the Bush administration has found a simple solution: It has ended the public dissemination of such images by banning news coverage and photography of dead soldiers' homecomings on all military bases. [Washington Post: Nation and Politics]

Ever Wanted a Weasel Award?

From Slashdot

colinmc151 writes "Well, Dilbert's Way of the Weasel Poll Results are in, with 35,874 people voting. Weaseliest Organization was won by the Recording Industry Association of America. Weaseliest Company was won by Microsoft. The Weaseliest Individual award was won by George W. Bush. Weaseliest Profession went to Politicians. Weaseliest Country went to France. Weaseliest Behavior was 'Blaming fast food restaurants for making you fat.' Congratulations to all the deserving winners."

CDT Releases Report on "Broadcast Flag" Copy Protections

Wouldn't it be nice if the "content cartel" "allowed" us to use our Fair Use rights under the Constitution without trying to stop us from doing things like timeshifting for our OWN use?

CDT released a major report on proposed copy protections for new digital television (DTV) broadcasts. The "broadcast flag" proposal, now before the FCC, would require new TVs, recorders, computers, and other devices to include approved copy protection technology if they are to receive or record protected DTV programs. CDT's report details the flag proposal, the copyright problems that motivated it, and the concerns it raises about consumer uses of television and future innovation. October 20, 2003 [Center for Democracy and Technology]

Hagel Says Bush Has Too Much Leeway

DUH! Let's state the OBVIOUS why don't we?

OMAHA, Oct. 21 -- Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) is strongly criticizing Congress, saying it gave President Bush too much latitude in conducting foreign policy after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. [Washington Post: Nation and Politics]

October 18, 2003

George Bush Chosen by God?????

Does this scare anyone else? It certainly scares ME

God has chosen US President George Bush to lead the United States and the fight against 'Satan', according to the general leading the hunt for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

It is alleged Lt Gen William Boykin also claimed that the Christian God is "bigger" than Allah, who is a false "idol", the Daily Telegraph reported.

The controversial comments will be seized on by Muslims who will claim the 'war on terror' is a crusade against Islam. [Madville.com]

October 15, 2003

What Happens Next?

Three Americans were killed in Gaza. The "powers that be" likely know a lot more about this than we do, so the State Dept. advised Americans to leave Gaza. The Palestinian "usual suspects" were almost too quick to deny knowledge and responsibility. So what does this mean and why is this important?

First of all, it shows that the Palestinian authority does NOT have control of every little thing in the territories. If they did, this attack would not have happened. It is so far counter to the best interests of the Palestinians that only a complete renegade nincompoop would have done it.

Why is it counter productive? First off, the Israelis already agreed to start pulling back from Gaza. Not a great idea to give them an excuse to stay for that overused catch-all phrase "security reasons." Secondly, when our Commander in Chief has a history of cowboy diplomacy, it's not terribly wise to give him any excuses either.

So why do it? Why paint bulls eyes on the backs of every Palestinian militant (or militant look-alike) in Gaza? Who would WANT the peace process to fail? Who would WANT the Shrub to get a bug up his butt and start blowing up anything around the region that might possibly maybe sometime in the last 10 years have harbored terrorists?

Who could it possibly be? Could it be....SATAN?!?!?!. Or instead could it be someone completely STUPID? Some idiot who thought it would be a fun idea?

In either case, I certainly hope that the Shrub doesn't take the bait and use this incident as a political catalyst for expanding the "War on Terror" to include as much of the Middle East as possible. Time will tell.

October 14, 2003

Break Away From Captors, Fight Back And...

What are these people thinking? If he had a gun and shot these people, would there be any question regarding whether or not it was ok to use deadly force to protect yourself and your friends? *ARGH* This makes me MAD

Philip Willan in Rome
Monday October 13, 2003
The Guardian

A Chinese martial arts expert was in custody yesterday after turning the tables on four burglars armed with knives, killing two of them and seriously wounding a third.

The 28-year-old man, known as "the doctor" for his practice of acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, managed to seize one of the two knives carried by his assailants and saw off the entire group with the ferocity of his reaction.

Magistrates in the central Italian town of Empoli are now seeking to establish whether his self-defence constituted an excessive use of force.

The butchery, worthy of a Quentin Tarantino film, began shortly before midnight on Friday when the four men knocked at the apartment of a Chinese hairdresser in the centre of Empoli.

The hairdresser, her assistant and "the doctor", who operated from the same premises, were reportedly overpowered and tied up before the group, all thought to be in their 20s and 30s, ransacked the apartment.

Disappointed by their meagre booty, the attackers allegedly threatened to rape the two women unless they told them where the rest of their money was hidden.

At this point the doctor managed to free himself, seize a knife from one of the aggressors and deliver a series of lethal stab wounds.

Investigators found the body of one man, who had been stabbed in the heart, sprawled on the staircase and another man bleeding to death in the street from a wound to his leg. A third man is recovering in hospital from a punctured lung.

The doctor was found crouching in the entrance to the building with cuts to his shoulder, face and hands.

Investigators are trying to determine whether he inflicted the injuries while defending himself inside the apartment, or hunted down the burglars after they had fled.

Collect the Whole Plushy Set

So what is going to be next? Terrorists have talked about putting explosives in feminine sanitary devices or perhaps duty free liquor? Or is this just some justification for harassing 5 year old children?

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Department of Homeland Security on Tuesday confirmed terrorists have discussed using stuffed animals, pillows and clothing to smuggle explosives aboard commercial airliners.

The explosive -- nitrocellulose -- is a propellant for ammunition and some rockets and is extremely flammable when packed in a sturdy container.

More from CNN

Essential To A Busy Life

Yes, it really does work!! It actually detects methane (fart) gas. When gas is detected, you will hear:

"Warning! Fart detected!
Whoop! Whoop!"

Do you dare to bring it with you the next time you ride an elevator?...

Batteries included

October 12, 2003

Our Own Domain Name

Well, we just had to go and do it. Tired of the silly long URL, I registered darkrantings.com with my favorite ISP. Therefore, all you need to do is type in http://www.darkrantings.com to get to this, your absolute FAVORITE ranting website in the whole ranting world.

October 10, 2003

Shrub Vows to "Crack Down" on EVIL Tourists

Today, in a blindingly political maneuver, President Shrub has decided to "crack down" on those horrible evil cheaters who go to Cuba for tourism. Why? Perhaps he needs the Cuban expat vote. More likely, his BROTHER needs it to stay Governor.

Why in the WORLD would we prohibit tourism to Cuba? We allow tourism to Vietnam, even after their current regime killed over 50,000 Americans. Hell, we even allow tourism to FRANCE, after attempting to stomp the country's name out of the breakfast food and junk food arenas.

Could a prohibition on tourism to Cuba POSSIBLY be political? *Gasp* Say it ain't SO!

Bush Expands Axis of Evil

From Deadbrain

DeadBrain can exclusively reveal today that star 37 Gem – the star most recently determined to have the highest chance of harbouring alien life - has been targeted by US President "Boy" George W Bush as being a key participant in the so-called Axis of Evil.

The star was discovered by Maggie Turnbull of the University of Arizona in Tucson, after many years of searching for a suitable star to research. She eventually homed in on Gem 37 because of a freak similarity between its name and the number of countries President Bush has accused of harbouring terrorists in the last year or so. DeadBrain cornered Secretary of Offence Donald Rumsfeld to find out exactly what prompted the President's claims.

"Yeah, the Pres. had got all the guys together, ya know, and we had a few brewskis and, well, shucks, that damn star was just so damn irritating. I mean, what kind of name is 'Gem 37'. Stupid universe."

DeadBrain tentatively pointed out that he had not actually given a reason for the absurd suggestion that a star was harbouring terrorists or WMDs, at which point we were ejected from Mr Rumsfeld's doorstep.

However, a leaked document from the White House, written by "Boy" George himself, has indicated the two main reasons for the President's decision. Heading the list was "Starsky and Hutch bad show. Me no like stars", closely followed by "Gems pretty". The document went on to indicate that after hours of careful thought, the President came to his current conclusion.

Speaking on the condition that he would remain rich and fat, a loyal White House source attempted to justify the President's argument. "Well, it's true that normally a star can't harbour terrorists and all their icky weapons, but this star has temperatures of several billion degrees – a little bit above our star - and it's a prime place for alien life. Science said so. It's proof that someone is trying to hide something by confusing our infra-red sensors, yeah?"

The White House now plans to lobby the EU for support in sending inspectors to the star to investigate.

The star itself has meanwhile released a statement declaring jihad on the Americans, and was quickly backed up by pledges of support from al-Qaeda. Claims that the statement was faked to give the Americans a reason for attacking were quickly dismissed as "ludicrous".

Student sued over CD piracy study

Use of the shift key is now going to be actionable under the fatally flawed DMCA. Will the stupidity ever stop?

A US student is being sued for showing how to get around anti-piracy technology on a new music CD. [BBC News | TECHNOLOGY]

UPDATE: In the face of actual brainpower, they've decided NOT to sue after all. Well gee, if they can get a brain, maybe there's hope?.... Naw.....

October 09, 2003

Watch Fox? Republican? Then you're WRONG!!!

We Report, You Get It Wrong
By Jim Lobe
Inter Press Services
Asia Times

Friday 03 October 2003

The more commercial television news you watch, the more wrong you are likely to be about key elements of the Iraq War and its aftermath, according to a major new study released in Washington on Thursday.

And the more you watch the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News channel, in particular, the more likely it is that your perceptions about the war are wrong, adds the report by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA).

Based on several nationwide surveys it conducted with California-based Knowledge Networks since June, as well as the results of other polls, PIPA found that 48 percent of the public believe US troops found evidence of close pre-war links between Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist group; 22 percent thought troops found weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq; and 25 percent believed that world public opinion favored Washington's going to war with Iraq. All three are misperceptions.

The report, Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War, also found that the more misperceptions held by the respondent, the more likely it was that s/he both supported the war and depended on commercial television for news about it.

The study is likely to stoke a growing public and professional debate over why mainstream news media - especially the broadcast media - were not more skeptical about the Bush administration's pre-war claims, particularly regarding Saddam Hussein's WMD stockpiles and ties with al-Qaeda.

"This is a dangerously revealing study," said Marvin Kalb, a former television correspondent and a senior fellow of the Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

While Kalb said he had some reservations about the specificity of the questions directed at the respondents, he noted that, "People who have had a strong belief that there is an unholy alliance between politics and the press now have more evidence." Fox, in particular, has been accused of pursuing a chauvinistic agenda in its news coverage despite its motto, "We report, you decide".

Overall, according to PIPA, 60 percent of the people surveyed held at least one of the three misperceptions through September. Thirty percent of respondents had none of those misperceptions.

Surprisingly, the percentage of people holding the misperceptions rose slightly over the last three months. In July, for example, polls found that 45 percent of the public believed US forces had found "clear evidence in Iraq that Hussein was working closely with al-Qaeda". In September, 49 percent believed that.

Likewise, those who believed troops had found WMD in Iraq jumped from 21 percent in July to 24 percent in September. One in five respondents said they believed that Iraq had actually used chemical or biological weapons during the war.

In determining what factors could create the misperceptions, PIPA considered a number of variables in the data.

It found a high correlation between respondents with the most misperceptions and their support for the decision to go to war. Only 23 percent of those who held none of the three misperceptions supported the war, while 53 percent who held one misperception did so. Of those who believe that both WMDs and evidence of al-Qaeda ties have been found in Iraq and that world opinion backed the United States, a whopping 86 percent said they supported war.

More specifically, among those who believed that Washington had found clear evidence of close ties between Hussein and al-Qaeda, two-thirds held the view that going to war was the best thing to do. Only 29 percent felt that way among those who did not believe that such evidence had been found.

Another factor that correlated closely with misperceptions about the war was party affiliation, with Republicans substantially "more likely" to hold misperceptions than Democrats. But support for Bush himself as expressed by whether or not the respondent said s/he intended to vote for him in 2004 appeared to be an even more critical factor.

The average frequency of misperceptions among respondents who planned to vote for Bush was 45 percent, while among those who plan to vote for a hypothetical Democrat candidate, the frequency averaged only 17 percent.

Asked "Has the US found clear evidence Saddam Hussein was working closely with al-Qaeda"? 68 percent of Bush supporters replied affirmatively. By contrast, two of every three Democrat-backers said no.

But news sources also accounted for major differences in misperceptions, according to PIPA, which asked more than 3,300 respondents since May where they "tended to get most of [their] news''. Eighty percent identified broadcast media, while 19 percent cited print media.

Among those who said broadcast media, 30 percent said two or more networks; 18 percent, Fox News; 16 percent, CNN; 24 percent, the three big networks - NBC (14 percent), ABC (11 percent), CBS (9 percent); and three percent, the two public networks, National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).

For each of the three misperceptions, the study found enormous differences between the viewers of Fox, who held the most misperceptions, and NPR/PBS, who held the fewest by far.

Eighty percent of Fox viewers were found to hold at least one misperception, compared to 23 percent of NPR/PBS consumers. All the other media fell in between.

CBS ranked right behind Fox with a 71 percent score, while CNN and NBC tied as the best-performing commercial broadcast audience at 55 percent. Forty-seven percent of print media readers held at least one misperception.

As to the number of misconceptions held by their audiences, Fox far outscored all of its rivals. A whopping 45 percent of its viewers believed all three misperceptions, while the other commercial networks scored between 12 percent and 16 percent. Only nine percent of readers believed all three, while only four percent of the NPR/PBS audience did.

PIPA found that political affiliation and news source also compound one another. Thus, 78 percent of Bush supporters who watch Fox News said they thought the United States had found evidence of a direct link to al-Qaeda, while 50 percent of Bush supporters who rely on NPR/PBS thought so.

Conversely, 48 percent of Fox viewers who said they would support a Democrat believed that such evidence had been found. But none of the Democrat-backers who relied on NPR/PBS believed it.

The study also debunked the notion that misperceptions were due mainly to the lack of exposure to news.

Among Bush supporters, those who said they follow the news "very closely", were found more likely to hold misperceptions. Those Bush supporters, on the other hand, who say they follow the news "somewhat closely" or "not closely at all" held fewer misperceptions.

Conversely, those Democratic supporters who said they did not follow the news very closely were found to be twice as likely to hold misperceptions as those who said they did, according to PIPA.

Do You Feel Safe, Punk?

Airport Screeners Got Job Test Answers

Oct 8, 9:29 PM (ET)

By LESLIE MILLER

WASHINGTON (AP) - Airport screeners hired by the government to check baggage for bombs were given most of the answers to the tests they took to qualify for the job, according to an internal Homeland Security Department investigation.

In addition, job applicants were not required to show they could identify dangerous objects inside luggage, a "critical defect" in the written tests, according to acting department inspector general Clark Kent Ervin.

"It is extremely disturbing that most of the questions were rehearsed before the final examination, that a number of the questions were phrased so as to provide an obvious clue to the correct answer, and other questions appear to be simplistic," Ervin wrote in a letter to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

During classroom training, screeners were given the questions in open-book quizzes and then the answers. The course ended with a closed-book examination of 25 questions. Nineteen of the questions on the final test were identical or virtually identical and three were similar to those on the quizzes, Ervin said.

One question asked "How do threats get aboard an aircraft?" The possible answers were (a) In carry-on bags; (b) In checked-in bags; (c) In another person's bag; and (d) All of the above. The correct answer is (d).

Another question asked why it's important to screen bags for improvised explosive devices (IEDs). A possible answer: "The ticking timer could worry other passengers." The right answer: "IEDs can cause loss of lives, property and aircraft."

Schumer, who asked for the probe, said the point of federalizing airport security was to improve safety by employing better-trained workers.

"The ludicrousness of this test undercuts everything Congress was trying to do in that regard," Schumer said.

Ervin's letter to Schumer was dated Aug. 29 but was not released until Wednesday. The senator's office said the letter was meant to be distributed sooner, but got lost in the mail due to problems with the Senate mail system that have been occurring since the anthrax scare about two years ago.

The Transportation Security Administration, created by Congress after the Sept. 11 terror attacks and later incorporated into the Homeland Security Department, was charged with a massive task: hiring tens of thousands of government workers in less than a year to replace the poorly trained, poorly paid, privately employed screeners who checked passengers before they boarded airplanes.

About 30,000 of the screeners have been cross-trained to inspect all checked baggage for bombs using newly installed explosive detection systems or wands that detect traces of explosive chemicals. The agency is continuing to cross-train passenger screeners.

TSA spokesman Brian Turmail said the agency has already reviewed and improved its training and may make further improvements. But he also said the inspector general did not look at the entire training program.

He said the one test reviewed by Ervin is part of a broader training program that includes 40 hours of classroom training, 60 hours of on-the-job training and four tests. The tests no longer use the questions cited by the inspector general.

No one becomes a baggage screener unless he demonstrates he can find a bomb in a suitcase using detection machines, Turmail said.

Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., chairman of the House aviation subcommittee, plans to hold a hearing Oct. 16 about the TSA's operations, including training and testing of screeners.

"Anytime you have a government undertake a program of this size and scope, it's going to be fraught with problems," Mica said.

A recently released report by the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress, concluded the agency collects little information on screener performance in detecting threat objects and is falling short in making sure the screeners are effectively supervised.

October 08, 2003

Chris Lives Up to His Billing

While righteously defending republicans against non republicans, and decrying the republican bashing that MAY have gone on in California, Chris bashes non-republicans as unprincipled nincompoops while forgetting two very important facts. 1) George W. Bush is stupid and at this point, with republicans like John Ashcroft and his ilk, many freedom loving Americans do hate republicans. In fact, many hate democrats too. It's basically a "hate them all" relationship.

But let's examine a few "facts." Now I don't care for Gray Davis, but still the recall was not overwhelming. And secondly, Arnold doesn't even SMELL conservative. He is a "European Liberal." Or was that Eurotrash...I don't remember which :-)

Can you be clever and stupid at the same time? Why most certainly yes. See, for example Dubbya's poem to his wife:

Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
Oh my Lump in the Bed
How I've Missed You

That is likely the most clever thing Dubya has done to date as President. A marvelous summation of his relationship with his wife written with the skill of Justice Rhenquist. Contrast this with his social policies. At least Arnold will be able to read them in the original German..

The Governator: what just happened?

California indeed voted to recall Gray Davis. The majority was not exactly overwhelming (54.4% for to 45.6% against), but the results are remarkable nonetheless, considering the nearly socialist views held by most of the residents of California.

There is an interesting map that shows a precinct-by-precinct breakdown of the California recall ballot. The distribution is simply fascinating. Largely, the coastal regions largely voted to keep Davis while the inner counties voted to toss him like yesterday's Taco Grande Meal. The inner counties have mountains and agriculture, and less of the affluence afforded the coast. But attempts to impose economic classifications on the recall results fail: consider that Santa Barbara voted 57% to toss him; San Diego 66%.

Does this mean that the decision to toss Davis was not based on the state's fiscal lunacy? Well, not exactly. For most people, the decision really boiled down this way:

  1. Those who voted "Yes" finally figured out that the inmates are running the asylum.
  2. Those who voted "No" voted based on their fear that anything that even smells conservative is evil, and it's better to keep a loser like Davis in office than risk allowing a republican to even speak.
The democratic party distributes daily "talking points" memos to their lackies at the media (just read about the Los Angeles Times contraversy). The key talking points of the democratic party are:
  1. George W. Bush is stupid
  2. We hate republicans.

The strategy is this: convince the people that republicans are trying to take away your freedom, spend all your money on the military, and make themselves rich. At the same time, they portray top republicans as ignoramuses. Fortunately, and contrary to liberals' popular belief, "the people" aren't so stupid after all. They realize the flaw in the democratic line is that you can't be both clever and stupid at the same time. Which is it - are they slick, clever politicians trying to plot against us? Or are they stupid bumblers? They can't be both at the same time. Well, which is it?

The political process in America has degenerated to the following: you hold your nose, you walk into the booth, and you pull the lever for the guy who stinks the least. You win by either making yourself stink less, or making the other guy stink more. In the final hours before the recall election, California democratic operatives made their decision clear.

This isn't to say that Arnold doesn't stink, too. Some days you're the rubber, some days you're the glue. I'm just surprised California didn't elect Kato Kaelin. (Hey, at least he'd finally have a place to live).

Back to the map, upon which one has to ask the question: why the coastal vs. inner precinct rift? The conclusions one must draw are ominous indeed. It has been long understood that liberalism is not really a political idealogy. It is a mental disorder, a sociopathic disease not unlike the plague (spread by even filthier rats). The frightening point demonstrated by this map is that it is a highly contagious disease. The good news? Californians are starting to recognize this, and yesterday their first dose of antibiotic necessary to get well.

Congratulations to California, and "get well soon."

Introducing a NEW AUTHOR

I thought it would be a fantastic idea to get a rabid rightist republican to post to Dark Rantings to give me something more to rant about. Therefore, please welcome Rabid Rightist Rochester Republican Chris Piggott. Feel free to post many comments.

Court Says Do-Not-Call List Can Be Enforced

And it's about time, too. Their First Amendment rights end where my ringing phone begins.

A federal appeals court has given the Federal Trade Commission the go-ahead to start enforcing its national do-not-call list, finding that the government is likely to prove that it is in the public's interest to curb unwanted telephone sales calls. [Washington Post: Front Page]

October 07, 2003

So then, my crazy husband...

Happy fun Wessiepooh disappeared for awhile last night. I had taken a long nap and woke up to find he had departed. So I waited awhile and heard someone crashing up the stairs. The key fumbled around in the door, and Wessiepooh stumbled into the room, drunk as the proverbial skunk. The naughty Wilco, Ernst and Sherman went kidnapped the poor man and forced him to drink huge quantities of alcohol. For this, they will be punished.

It was a rough night, let me tell you, with a very sick little man, spending much time speaking to his best friend, the porcelain god. What should we do with this man? *argh*

Anyway, he wasn't doing too great this morning. But we went diving anyway. Silly silly wessiepooh.

October 06, 2003

Tigers as Pets?

Watching a CNN story, the reporter said that over 15,000 people in the United States keep tigers as pets. You can buy a tiger for less than $1000.00. What? An endangered animals can be bought by any yahoo who wants to use it as a virtual penis enlargement tool for $1,000?

In a country where some states ban owning ferrets and some communities disallow pot belly pigs, how can ANYONE think having a tiger is a good idea? DUH.

October 04, 2003

Tiger Eats Roy. Everyone Shocked

Yo, people. You take a huge multi hundred pound jungle cat, piss it off, and it DOES THINGS. Why is everyone shocked and surprised that an annoyed jungle cat would attack someone? Go figure.

Yes, it was an awful thing to happen. Yes, it's terrible that Roy is in such bad condition and might die. But was it surprising? No. Is it the tiger's fault? No.

I can only hope that they don't put this tiger to death for being a tiger.

It's Awfully Rough...

It's awfully rough to find something to rant about while being in Bonaire for 11 days, but ok...here goes.

I need to rant because there have just been TOO MANY FISH. Yes, that's right. Too many fish to get in the way when I'm trying to take pictures. Especially those pesky frogfish. They are everywhere. They're driving me insane. I don't know what to do with them. Pushing them out of the way to take pictures of much more interesting things like uh...sponges, is just so difficult.

You can see some of these pictures with those horrible frogfish in the way, click here to see them .