Main

February 17, 2004

EFF Privacy Coalition Presses Congress for Hearings on Air Traveler Privacy

You GO EFF. If there was a real correlation between terrorism and surrender of private information, perhaps the government would have a point. However, the cold hard fact is that the majority of the 9/11 hijackers had NO criminal record and NO private information available to the government that would have flagged them. Furthermore, what information would they be looking for from American citizens that would make them ineligible to board an aircraft? Gun permits? Bad credit? Drug charges? Unpaid child support? It makes no sense.

"The amount of data -- potentially incorrect data -- that the government is asking to access before permitting you to fly is simply astounding," said Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney at EFF. "Doing background checks on every American who chooses air travel doesn't seem like a logical way to keep bombs and weapons off of planes." [EFF: Press]

January 15, 2004

US using EU airline data to 'test' CAPPS II snoop system

They aren't allowed to use US data yet, but that won't stop them from sneakily obtaining it from the EU, whose strong personal data privacy laws wouldn't allow this without the clandestine deal.

Commission less than candid about deal within deal [The Register]

January 02, 2004

TSA - Terribly Sloshed Administrators?

So we have multiple British Airways flights from London to Dulles being cancelled due to security concerns, and we find that the head of the agency charged with security at Dulles can't even be trusted with securing himself from the alcohol. Today's Washington Post reported that during an orange alert, New Year's Eve, the head of the agency supposedly responsible for our safety in the skies, was weaving around the road because he couldn't drive properly.

So, what has the TSA actually done to enhance our safety? I was absolutely shocked today to find out that only 20% of the cargo that is placed on board planes loaded with passengers, is actually inspected. And who is inspecting it? People who are absolutely positively UNTRAINED to detect explosives, biological weapons, or chemical weapons. These poor individuals who are charged with making the cargo safe don't have the slightest clue in the world what to do besides open a package and look inside. No bomb sniffing dogs. No x ray machines. No nothing.

Don't you feel safe now that general aviation aircraft are prohibited from getting too close to America's Favorite Shrub, but an aircraft out of Dulles with only 20% of its cargo checked and passengers screened by an agency headed by an alleged drunk driver can go on its merry way and possibly be detonated above DC plunging into who knows what?

Yes, but at least those pesky little Cessna 152s are out of the area...right?

December 31, 2003

Just When You Thought Things Were Stupid Enough

After I just heard an ad for TSA screeners paying from 11.00 to 16.00 an hour, I thought perhaps that for those types of wages they might be hiring people with two brain cells to rub together. Unfortunately, I was wrong. Were they afraid that perhaps someone would pack explosives in the fish? What is it about airports that shuts off the brains of anyone wearing a uniform? I'm afraid I can only sit slack jawed with wonder

From The Post Gazette Contributed by Paul H. :-)

Forum: The fish that threatened national security

College student Lara Hayhurst was not prepared to let officials treat her little pet like Osama 'fin' Laden

Sunday, December 28, 2003

Like many college students who flew home for the holidays, I had to endure the latest airport safeguards in the name of homeland security. A lot of us have stories to tell, but only mine is a fish tale, a contemporary melodrama of the absurd to prepare you for future travels.

Continue reading "Just When You Thought Things Were Stupid Enough" »

December 27, 2003

U.S. Probes No-Shows for Paris Flights

Yes, of course, those damn pilots must be scrutinized definitely. Those horrible pilots might break through those extra strong super cool cockpit doors with a pair of tweezers and threaten to shape their eyebrows. This is SO annoying. I'm wondering when I'm going to be interrogated or prevented from boarding an aircraft because I'm one of those *gasp* horrible PILOTS

U.S. investigators want to speak with a small number of people in Paris who failed to show up for boarding flights to Los Angeles that fell under close scrutiny in a possible terrorist plot, including one pilot-trainee, a U.S. official said. [AP World News]

December 16, 2003

Let's Celebrate 100 Years of Powered Flight By Excluding Pilots

Gee, thanks George W. Bush for spoiling the plans of pilots across the country by deciding to grace First Flight with his presence, thus essentially shutting down the General Aviation airports closest to the celebration. What an ironic slap in the face to the freedom of flight.

As Phil Boyer, President of the AOPA (Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association) said, "This has got to be the bitterest irony — that America will celebrate a century of powered flight by grounding aircraft at the birthplace of powered flight," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "Certainly the President deserves protection when he travels. But because his security personnel continue to insist on demanding oversized TFRs, the inheritors of the Wright brothers' legacy — America's pilots — are being penalized." Read the AOPA article here

November 05, 2003

White House Told To Justify Secrecy

This could be an interesting fight between the judicial and executive branches of our government. It will be quite interesting to watch Ashcroft attempt to wiggle out of this one.

The Supreme Court announced yesterday that it wants the Bush administration to defend the secrecy that enveloped lower federal courts' proceedings involving one of the 1,200 Arab and Muslim men detained by federal authorities after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. [Washington Post: Nation and Politics]

October 09, 2003

Do You Feel Safe, Punk?

Airport Screeners Got Job Test Answers

Oct 8, 9:29 PM (ET)

By LESLIE MILLER

WASHINGTON (AP) - Airport screeners hired by the government to check baggage for bombs were given most of the answers to the tests they took to qualify for the job, according to an internal Homeland Security Department investigation.

In addition, job applicants were not required to show they could identify dangerous objects inside luggage, a "critical defect" in the written tests, according to acting department inspector general Clark Kent Ervin.

"It is extremely disturbing that most of the questions were rehearsed before the final examination, that a number of the questions were phrased so as to provide an obvious clue to the correct answer, and other questions appear to be simplistic," Ervin wrote in a letter to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.

During classroom training, screeners were given the questions in open-book quizzes and then the answers. The course ended with a closed-book examination of 25 questions. Nineteen of the questions on the final test were identical or virtually identical and three were similar to those on the quizzes, Ervin said.

Continue reading "Do You Feel Safe, Punk?" »

September 30, 2003

Passenger Profiling Violates Rights, Doesn't Improve Safety

EFF states the blindingly obvious to everyone except the Administration. Profiling isn't allowed elsewhere, but it seems ok when we're talking about aviation.

"We're concerned that the Homeland Security Department's CAPPS II plan sacrifices the privacy and civil liberties of travelers without a logical connection to safety and security," said EFF Attorney Kevin Bankston. [EFF: Press]

September 24, 2003

Fliers File Suit Against JetBlue

It's about time that people stand up for what is right and hold companies responsible for their breaches of trust - ed.

Passengers are filing a class-action lawsuit against JetBlue Airways for fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of contract and invasion of privacy. Meanwhile, the FTC reviews a privacy group's formal complaint against the airline. [Wired News]

September 18, 2003

Jet Blue Shares Passenger Data

Trust has been destroyed completely in JetBlue and it's the company's own fault. Ridiculous. Anyone who has any semblance of a brain whatsoever should never, EVER fly an airline that would sell out its passengers so completely.

The airline admits it gave 5 million itineraries to a defense contractor last year without passengers' consent. The contractor bought more personal information on the passengers, including Social Security numbers -- for what purpose? By Ryan Singel. [Wired News]

August 11, 2003

Cookie Cutter CFIs

I hadn't flown for a very long time, nor operated in the Shrub's latest brilliant idea, the ADIZ, so I thought I'd go to Leesburg and get a CFI and go flying. Thought maybe I could get an instrument check out as well, so i could do some more practice and get my skills back to the point where they should be. This should all be pretty easy, right? HA! Little did I know I was dealing with .... Mr. "By The Book" who wasn't quite sure WHAT book he was even using.

Everything started out innocently enough, with Mr. CFI giving me the keys, POH, and location of the Seminole we were going to fly. Not a bad airplane. Brand new just about. So I let myself in, did the preflight (finding the fuel drains was amusing) and got everything ready to go. CFI comes out and tells me now we have to go file a flight plan. Hmmm..thought that would be something he would have done already. Guess not.

So off we go to Leesburg Flight Service, right next door, file the ADIZ plan (direct FDK), call Potomac Approach before start up, got the squawk, started her up and taxied on out to 17. The aircraft had no checklist of any use (gee, thanks) so I had to rely on memory for most things. Since I was flying a twin, I never use the fuel pump, so brain farted on that. CFI finds this to be a flagrant violation of something or another and mutters to himself. Uh, ok kid. If there was a CHECKLIST maybe I wouldn't have FORGOTTEN, but since I told him I hadn't flown in ages, you'd think he'd be nicer. Anyway, I told him I didn't know how to use the Garmin 430s in the aircraft to fly approaches, but he seemed to think that was ok anyway, he'd set them up. Fine says me...and off we go.

CFI hadn't asked for, nor did we recieve any notams on the construction going on at Frederick. When we arrived, I didn't notice anything weird because I wasn't looking up... hit the fix, went outbound on the VOR (after explaining to CFI that you don't use the LOC outbound, read the chart...) reached the fix, did all the right stuff, intercepted inbound and kept it within 1 dot. When I looked up, I noticed this uh...displaced threshold 1/2 way down the runway at FDK. I suggested FDK because I wanted a long runway to practice t/o and landings. This was not it! Egads. I put it down anyway, nice landing, brought it back around and we just about had time to do some air work and get back to Leesburg.

On climb out, CFI noticed I hadn't raised the gear. I would later be admonished for this, as yet another example of my poor procedures. Sheesh. Didn't seem to matter that I did steep turns to within 100 feet, and slow flight with no problem even after not having flown for forever. Nor did it matter that I shot the loc into Leesburg with less than 1/2 a dot off and squeaked the landing.

In the debrief I was basically told that I might be somewhat safe VFR, but I shouldn't take any passengers, and IFR was right out. My procedures were awful, and I needed a lot more practice. Well gee. Thanks. I think the kid just wanted more multi time and thought I'd fly with him some more.

Now, in most cases, I'd be the first to say that when a pilot starts bitching about a CFI's "check out" that it's usually that the pilot is lousy and the CFI is just being prudent. I think that perhaps the "old bold" pilot is just dangerous, and whining because the CFI saw that, and called the pilot on it. However, I can also see the times when the CFI is expecting much more out of a student than is practical, and also not taking into consideration what happens when you haven't flown for ages. When I asked him, he admitted that nothing I did was "unsafe." He was just "uncomfortable." This discomfort, I believe, was his inexperience and lack of multi and instrument teaching showing.

This is not to say that I don't need practice. I most certainly do. This is not to say he wasn't right about my procedures needing work. Yep, they do. But I'm not unsafe, and I should be competent to fly IFR with just a few more hours with ANOTHER CFI :-) Hey Paul, you busy? :-)

May 02, 1995

Epic Saga - Long Cross Country

From: Mikki Barry (ooblick@intercon.com)
Subject: Epic Saga of Long X Country


 

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student
Date: 1995/05/02
One of the most sadistic possible tortures that can be inflicted on a private
pilot wannabe is called the long cross country. In this thinly veiled version
of throwing the warrior into the deepest darkest jungle with a stone knife and
bearskin, the fledgling student pilot is sent to faraway airports, in some
sort of configuration of legs that equals at least 300 nautical miles, one leg
having to be at least 100 nautical miles long. Each wannabe pilot must do
this evil ritual, plus another unknown series of flights over 50 nautical
miles that add up to 10 hours worth of total cross country agony.

This is the epic story of the day that I was sent forth into the wilderness,
armed only with a sectional chart, a terminal area chart, and about $10,000
worth of electronic navigational equipment, a large contingent of FAA air
traffic controllers, weather personnel, and a cast of thousands. One would
think that with all this outside help, flying across the not so frozen tundra
would be simple, right? Well, um...not really. Lest we all forget, this is
ME we're talking about.

For this route, I chose the "ocean" tour. A nice flight to Ocean City, MD,
Ocean City, NJ, then Easton, MD, then home to Gaithersburg. A flight of
exactly 300.5 nautical miles with one leg being 108. Paul, that bastion of
flight instructorness, had signed off on the route the previous weekend, after
we had had a wonderful time playing in the crosswinds. I think that shook up
his brain just enough so that he would have signed off on a route to the
Smyrna vortac, even though there's no airport there. After all, he'd raised
my X wind component to 15 with total winds of 30 that day. He must have taken
one too many flight instructor valiums.

I had been scheduled to take this scenic tour on Tuesday. However, a quick
weather check revealed that Tuesday would be a *bad* [tm] day, and I should
instead do this Monday if I was going to get it over with. My weather
minimums were 2000 foot ceilings and 5 miles visibility. Monday was forecast
around 3500 foot ceilings and 10 to 20 miles visibility along the entire
route, cept for a 2200 foot mess somewhat southwest of the intended route. We
decided this was a go, and off I went, into the unknown, without a paddle
(without a canoe for that matter, but hey, who's watching?).

I had decided to do the longest leg of this trans suburban journey first, to
get it out of the way. So I taxied to the end of runway 32 at Montgomery,
around this ridiculous bunch of media types probably doing a "why we should
close this airport" documentary, and watched them immediately swing their
camera around to watch the little red and white airplane take off. I felt
like doing the run up in their general direction, but decided to be nice and
turn the plane the other way :-). After an uneventful take-off, I called my
pals at Baltimore approach and asked to "traverse the Class B" (oh doesn't
that sound just so 'pilot-like'? :-)). I had them snowed, cuz they said that
was fine. The adventure had begun. Silly me thought that this would be a
piece of cake now cuz those nice radar guys would tell me where to go and all.
Yeah, right. They told me where to go all right. Off course to the left,
descend 500 feet, off course to the right, climb 500 feet, swing back left
again, back the other way, then....guess what? Radar services terminated.
Have a great time. Thanks a lot, folks. By this time I was over the bay and
they told me to call Pautuxent approach. I'd heard these guys weren't the
sweetest in the world, and a few hours of listening to them before calling
confirmed that. They were giving some Arrow a rough time about maintaining
heading and altitude. Well, I thought I'd call them anyway and at least get
some sort of flight following so that I didn't wind up who knows where. They
were actually nice to me, probably because I could keep heading and altitude
sort of ok. Unfortunately, they didn't give me a suggested heading. Being
too proud to ask for one, or reveal my inept status as a student pilot, I
reviewed my checkpoints and times and determined I was on the right track. I
should have remembered that a bit later.

After what seemed like a very short time, Pautuxent "lost radar contact".
Rats! I had hoped they'd do a "do you see the airport" routine where they ask
and I say no and they tell me the airport's direction. Damn! Oh well. From
my estimates, I was about 10 miles outside the airport. Unfortunately,
nothing in the area really looked like I thought it should look. There was a
"hard" boundary on one side (the ocean), and the city of Ocean City on the
silly little sand bar our tax dollars get spent to add more sand to each year,
both of which made handy references. Unfortunately, even with these rather
obvious landmarks, I couldn't quite find this airport. So, I made the silly
mistake so many student pilots do. I changed course. Ooops!

After flying a few more minutes, and still not finding the airport, I started
doing the sectional to ground to sectional to ground to sectional again
routine. On that very last check to the sectional, I noticed a little magenta
box with a number in it. DUH! It was an NDB, and I just so happened to have
this little ADF. So, I tuned it in, remembered to ident, and headed where the
thing pointed. Still couldn't find the airport. ARGH! By now I was getting
pretty annoyed with things. The needle had swung back on itself, and I still
didn't see nuthin that looked like an airport. (Hey, at least this time I
wasn't at 4500 feet and needed to swoop down on it when I finally *did* find
it :-)). After what seemed to be eternity, and following the ADF around in
circles, there it was. Unicom told me where to land, I found the bathroom,
and life was good. They even had an airport cat whose picture I saw.
Unfortunately, the cat had been fed that morning, so he was long gone, doing
cat like things.

Leg number #2 began with a confused taxi around the airport, looking for the
taxiway I needed to get to the active runway. Once airborne, however, things
went pretty easily. I have no idea why I can spot VOR's from about 10 miles
out, and can't see airports til they bite me, but that's the way it works.
Saw the Waterloo VOR from way out there, grabbed the outbound radial, and
crossed the Delaware Bay, avoiding the nasty looking cloud hanging directly in
the path. Once on shore, I actually spotted an airport! Cape May was on my
right. Cool! At least I was in the right part of Joisey. From there,
finding the Sea Isle VOR was trivial, and then followed the radial off of that
to Ocean City. This time, even though I didn't see the airport precisely when
I thought I should, I didn't turn off course. See, I can learn something
sometimes :-). I called their unicom multiple times, looking for an airport
advisory. Nuthin. Oh well. Just when I thought I'd have to talk to Atlantic
City cuz I was going to dither into their space, I saw the teeny tiny little
runway real close to the beach. I still hadn't gotten an advisory, so I
decided to enter a downwind for 24. I called traffic, and let them know this
was the plan. Just then, this voice on the unicom says, rather urgently,
"Ocean City advises runway 6!". Well gee! I wish that Ocean City had advised
that a bit earlier in the game. Since I was set up, I told them I'd do a
straight in for 6, which they thought was just peachy. I hung around long
enough to have some wonderously useful caffeinated fizzy stuff, and headed out
for Easton.

The leg to Easton was totally uneventful and boring, and I can't make anything
funny out of any of it. However, the actual approach and landing at Easton
were...."amusing". Silly me, tired and shagged out, decided that Easton's
active (22) must be the same kind of orientation as Montgomery's active (32).
Cept for the little fact that Montgomery is right hand traffic. Oops! So I
went around for that "other left", mentioned something on the radio about 76R
being unable to tell right from left today, was on a right upwind, turning a
"modified" crosswind, courteously let someone coming in on a 45 for midfield
downwind ahead of me, and landed pretty well for a tired person :-).

More caffiene, a phone call to the worried boyfriend and one to my pals at
flight service who by now were tired of listening to me whine, and I was off
again, enroute home. Baltimore was wonderful, and cleared me into Class B,
and I was on my way. Three quarters of the way across the Chesapeake, they
called traffic to me at about 3500 feet, 2 miles out at 12:00. They said this
traffic was travelling in the same direction, but I was slowly overtaking it.
I looked, and told them I didn't have the traffic. Next thing I know, they're
calling the same traffic at 10:00 crossing left to right. This time I saw
him, and started descending because it was pretty clear that this guy was at
about 2000 feet, which, coincidentally was where I also happened to be. I was
about to call Baltimore to let them know I was doing this when they asked me
if I was descending to avoid this traffic. Well, like, YEAH! Next thing I
know, this guy had crossed in front, made a swooping left, and wound up facing
me at about 2:00. I decided it was wise, at that point, to get the hell out
of there, which I did, much to the controller's relief. Seems he had this
person who identified himself as a "student pilot on a cross country to York,
PA" to dote over. Guess this student had picked the 50% of the time when
identifying yourself as a student actually worked to get your sympathy points
with Baltimore approach :-).

At about 10 miles outside Montgomery, Baltimore terminated radar services
(rats!) and I started looking for the airport. The good news is that I knew
the landmarks pretty well and could actually find the "landfill" (actually a
dump) everyone uses to enter the pattern on a 45 for downwind. A few minutes
later and I was on the ground, vowing never to do anything like this again!
Boy was I tired. Wake me up sometime next week, ok?